The Garmin Forerunner 170 is described as a mid-range running smartwatch that primarily incorporates software upgrades rather than significant hardware changes, making it suitable for both runners and general users.
The device maintains reliable GPS and heart-rate performance during various activities, including runs, swims, and gym sessions, ensuring accurate sports tracking.
In terms of features, the Forerunner 170 enhances its utility as a fitness companion with additions such as Training Readiness, evening reports, and quick workouts. It also offers updated training insights and richer access to Garmin Coach.
The smartwatch aspects include reliable GPS, Garmin Pay functionality, and support for apps and offline music on the dedicated Music model, adding value beyond just structured training sessions.
Regarding its physical design, the Forerunner 170 features a larger case compared to the Forerunner 165 but utilizes the same AMOLED screen technology. It is available in four different color choices.
Performance-wise, the watch runs on Garmin’s latest user interface and includes enhanced lifestyle logging capabilities.
Battery life estimates range up to 10 days generally. With the always-on display mode activated, users can expect up to 4 days of battery power. When streaming music, it provides between 6.5 and 7.5 hours of usage.
Journalists should consider purchasing the Forerunner 170 if they desire a smaller, running-focused smartwatch that offers useful training features and enhanced insights.
Alternatively, individuals seeking the best value in a running watch at its price point might look at competitors such as the excellent Coros Pace 4 and Suunto Run, which focus on more pure running performance features than Garmin’s added smartwatch functionality.
The Forerunner 170 is characterized as capable, relying on helpful software upgrades for improvement rather than major hardware leaps. Its strong points include reliable sports tracking and useful training insights.
However, the report notes that battery life has dipped slightly, and it misses out on some of Garmin’s newest sensors. This suggests that rivals may offer better value if pure running performance is the primary concern.
Source: Trusted Reviews
